期刊文献+

回归复杂性:未来大学展望 被引量:21

Regression to Complexity:Development Prospect of Future Universities
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为人参与其中的生命系统,现代大学是一个典型的复杂系统。复杂性是一种认识大学组织的新的思维方式。在大众化、市场化、数字化、全球化和知识经济等多重因素的挤压下,现代大学模式正面临颠覆性的变革。如果说现代大学的组织模式是复杂性之简单化的产物,那么,未来大学的组织模式需要回归复杂性,从整体上将大学视为一个组织及环境构成的开放系统。建构未来大学的关键是寻找大学的最小封闭单位。根据最小封闭单位的不同,未来大学有两种主要的建构模式:一是以专业为最小封闭系统的大学(如斯科尔科沃大学);二是以课程为最小封闭系统的大学(如密涅瓦大学)。 Modern universities constitute a typical complex system while complexity is a new way of thinking for university organization modes. Under the extrusion of multiple factors such as massification, marketization, digitization, globalization and knowledge economy, modern universities are facing a subversive change. If the organization mode of modern universities is the product of simplicity, then the organization mode of future universities needs to return to complexity. And these universities would be regarded as an open system of organizations and environments. The key to building out- standing future universities is to find the minimum closed units of universities. According to different minimum closed units, there are mainly two building modes, one is to build a university which regards profession as its smallest closed system (Skolkovo Tech) while the other one is to build a university which regards curriculum as its smallest closed system (Minerva University).
作者 周光礼
出处 《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期43-52,共10页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering
基金 北京市社科基金重点课题"以科学研究支撑高质量本科教育的理论与实践"(14JYA002)的阶段成果之一
作者简介 周光礼,中国人民大学教育学院教授。
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献59

  • 1冒荣.高等教育现代化初探[J].江苏高教,1996(5):11-15. 被引量:12
  • 2<上海高等教育现代化指标研究>课题组,朱益明.上海高等教育现代化框架及其指标的展望[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(02B):16-23. 被引量:12
  • 3Ax, J. & Ponte, P. (2010). Moral issues in educational praxis: A perspective from pedagogiek and didactiek as human sciences in continental Europe. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 29-42.
  • 4Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • 5Biesta, G. J.J. (2005). What can critical pedagogy learn from postmodernism? Further reflections on the impossible future of critical pedagogy. I. Gur Ze'ev (ed) , Critical theory and critical pedagogy today. Toward a new critical language in education. Haifa : Studies in Education (University of Haifa) ,pp. 143-159.
  • 6Biesta, G. J. J. (2007a). Why "what works" won't work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Educational Theory, 57 ( 1 ), 1-22.
  • 7Biesta, G. J.J. (2007b). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (3), 295-301.
  • 8Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Values and ideals in teachers' professional judgement. S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall & A. Cribb (eds). Changing teacher professionalism (pp. 184-193). London: Routledge.
  • 9Biesta, G. J.J. (2010a). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.
  • 10Biesta, G. J.J. (20lOb). Five these on complexity reduction and its politics. D.C. Osberg & G. J.J. Biesta (Eds). Complexity theory and the politics of education. Rotterdam : Sense Publishers, pp. 5-14.

共引文献169

同被引文献195

引证文献21

二级引证文献266

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部