摘要
吴佩孚之死引发了社会舆论的轩然大波,从中深刻折射出抗战时期复杂的政治环境。各方围绕着吴佩孚因何而死、是否附逆及其历史功过展开激烈争论。日伪方面指吴佩孚之死为正常病逝,重庆方面则坚称吴氏系死于日方毒害。关于吴佩孚对"和平运动"的态度,日伪和重庆方面更是各执一词,互相攻讦。双方皆高度评价吴佩孚,不过侧重点却大相径庭。此外,中共和部分其他媒体亦表达了对吴氏之死的态度。因此之故,作为"过气"政客的吴佩孚在其身后一度又成为舆论关注的焦点。
Wu Peifu's death sparked off public opinion, which profoundly reflects the complex political ecology during the War of Anti-Japanese Aggression. All sectors of the society argued about the cause of Wu Peifu 's death,whether he had become a traitor, and how his historical contributions and errors should be evaluated. Those Japanese puppets said Wu Peifu died normally, while the national government in Chong Qing thought he died because of Japan's poison. Moreover, the opinions from the two sides were divided about Wu Peifu 's attitude to‘the peace movement', and also attacked each other. Both sides praised highly Mr. Wu, but their emphasis was totally different. Besides, the Communist Party of China and some other media also expressed their attitudes to the Wu's death. Therefore, as an outdated politician, Wu Peifu became the focus of public attention after his death.
出处
《学术研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期114-128,160,共15页
Academic Research
作者简介
林辉锋，北京师范大学历史学院副教授；
黄宝撰，北京师范大学历史学院硕士研究生（北京，100875）。
