期刊文献+

校园欺凌道德推脱量表在国内中学生群体中的信效度检验 被引量:7

Reliability and Validity of Moral Disengagement in Bullying Scale in Chinese Middle School Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:检验中文版校园欺凌道德推脱量表(Moral Disengagement in Bullying Scale, MDBS)的信度和效度。方法:选取1039名中学生为被试,填写中文版MDBS量表,采用攻击性量表(AQ)和青少年良心问卷作为效标。4周后随机抽取124名中学生进行重测。结果:MDBS中文版包括道德辩护、委婉标签、有利比较、责任推移、责任分散、扭曲后果、受害者归因7个因子,共18个项目;验证性因素分析显示,七因子模型的拟合指标良好(χ~2/df=3.35,CFI=0.929,TLI=0.905,RMSEA=0.055,SRMR=0.044);总量表得分与攻击性、良心得分显著相关(r=0.298、-0.383,P<0.001);总量表的Cronbachα为0.907,间隔4周的重测系数为0.775,7个因子的内部一致性信度在0.605-0.784之间,重测信度在0.642-0.783之间。结论:MDBS中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可作为国内中学生校园欺凌道德推脱的评估工具。 Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Moral Disengagement in Bullying Scale(MDBS). Methods: A sample of 1039 middle school students were asked to complete the Chinese version of MDBS. Aggression Questionnaire(AQ) and Conscience Questionnaire were chosen as the criterion-related indicators. 124 of the students were randomly selected to be retested after four weeks. Results: The Chinese version of MDBS contained 18 items and seven factors. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that MDBS had a good construct validity(χ2/df=3.35, CFI=0.929, TLI=0.905, RMSEA=0.055, SRMR=0.044). The MDBS scores were correlated with AQ and Adolescent Conscience Questionnaire(r=0.298、-0.383, P<0.001). Cronbach’s α coefficient and the test-retest reliability of MDBS was0.907 and 0.775. Cronbach’s a coefficient of seven subscales ranged 0.605-0.784, and the test-retest reliability ranged0.642-0.783. Conclusion: The MDBS is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the moral disengagement in bullying in Chinese middle school students.
作者 王小凤 燕良轼 邱小艳 WANG Xiao-feng;YAN Liang-shi;QIU Xiao-yan(The Students'Affair Department,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha 410004,China;Institute of Educational Science,Research Center of Psychology and Behavior,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China;Institute of Higher Education,Hunan University of Science and Engineering,Yongzhou 425199,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第1期54-58,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 湖南省教育科学"十三五"规划课题(XJK17QXL001)
关键词 校园欺凌道德推脱 信度 效度 中学生 Moral disengagement in bullying Reliability Validity Middle-school students
作者简介 通讯作者:燕良轼,E-mail:yanlshi@163.com.
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献72

  • 1李肃东.中西良心论比较——兼论良知说的当代重振[J].学习与探索,1993(3):66-74. 被引量:4
  • 2戴春林,吴明证,杨治良.个体攻击性结构与自尊关系研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):44-46. 被引量:41
  • 3李海青.大学生良知内隐观的调查研究[J].社会心理科学,2006,21(3):41-47. 被引量:6
  • 4黄任之,姚树桥,邹涛.个人主义和集体主义量表中文版信度和效度的研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(6):564-565. 被引量:16
  • 5Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall, 1986.
  • 6Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the preparation of inhumanities. Personal and Social Psychology Review, 1999,3 : 193-209.
  • 7Bandura A,Barbaranelli C,Caprara GV,et al. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,71 364-374.
  • 8Bandura A, Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, et al. Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001, 80:125-135.
  • 9Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV,et al. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996,71 (2): 364-374.
  • 10Bandura A,Barbaranelli C,Caprara GV ,et al. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 1996,67(3) : 1206-1222.

共引文献427

同被引文献105

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部