期刊文献+

中文版共情商数问卷的信度及效度研究 被引量:12

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Empathy Quotient
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析中文版共情商数问卷(the Empathy Quotient)的信度和效度。方法 :采用中文版共情商数问卷对173名孤独症儿童的父母及253名正常儿童的父母进行评估。结果:该量表的内部一致性系数为0.807;分半信度为0.702;重测信度为0.844。探索性因素分析结果表明该量表结构较松散;该量表与中文版人际反应指针量表具有良好的相容效度。此次的研究样本中,孤独症儿童的父母共情总分显著低于正常儿童父母的得分,性别差异不显著。结论:中文版共情商数问卷具有较好的信度及效度,可用作为共情能力评估工具应用于中国人群。 Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient (EQ). Methods: 175 parents of the children with autism and 253 parents of normal children completed the Empathy Quotient and the Interpersonal Reac- tivity Index (IRI); 30 subjects were retested by EQ. Results: The Cronbach-coefficient of EQ was 0.807; the split half of reliability was 0.702; the test-retest reliability was 0.844. Significant correlations were found between the EQ and IRI; the structure of EQ is loose. Conclusion: EQ has good reliability and validity in application to Chinese people.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期760-763,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家社会科学基金“十二五”规划2011年度教育学一般课题“孤独症儿童的心理理论发展特点及认知行为干预研究”(批准号:BBA110019)
关键词 共情 信度 效度 探索性因素分析 Empathy Reliability Validity Exploratory factor analysis
作者简介 通讯作者:周世杰
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Titchener E. Elementary psychology of the thought process?es. New York: Macmillan, 1909.
  • 2Kohler W. Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright, 1929.
  • 3Mead GH. Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.
  • 4Piaget 1. The moral judgment of the child. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1932.
  • 5Chapin FS. Preliminary standardization of a social insight scale. American Sociological Review, 1942, 7: 214-225.
  • 6Dymond RF. Personality and empathy. Journal of Consult?ing Psychology, 1950, 14: 343-350.
  • 7Kerr WA, Speroff BG. Validation and evaluationof the em?pathy test. Journal of General Psychology, 1954, 50: 369- 376.
  • 8Wellman H. Children's theories of mind. Bradford: MIT Press, 1990.
  • 9Baron -Cohen S. Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Boston: MIT PresslBradford Books, 1995.
  • 10Whiten A. Natural theories of mind. Oxford: Basil Black?well, 1991.

二级参考文献25

  • 1魏源.浙江某高校大学生共情特点分析[J].中国学校卫生,2007,28(2):135-137. 被引量:36
  • 2吕勤.饭店服务人员共情问卷的编制及其共情能力与服务绩效的关系[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2007,29(5):32-35. 被引量:8
  • 3Thompson E. Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2001,8(5-7) : 1-32.
  • 4Montg C ,Heinz A,Kunz D,et al. Self-reported empathic abilities in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Res,2007,92 (1-3): 85-89.
  • 5Shamay-Tsoory SG, Shur S, Harari H, et al. Neurocognitive basis of impaired empathy in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology,2007,21(4) :431-438.
  • 6Bora E,Gokcen S,Veznedaroglu B. Empathic abilities in people with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res,2008,160(1): 23 -29.
  • 7Henry JD, Bailey PE, Rendel PG. Empathy, social functioning and schizotypy. Psychiatry Res, 2008,160(1) : 15-22.
  • 8Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1980,10 : 85.
  • 9Davis MH. Empathy:A social Psychological Approach. Boulder Westview Press, 1996. 62-81.
  • 10Gladstein GA. Understanding empathy:Integrating counseling, developmental, and social psychology perspectives. Journal Counseling Psychology, 1983,30(4) : 467-482.

共引文献348

同被引文献143

引证文献12

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部