期刊文献+

克罗恩病患者黏膜相关细菌群落多样性分析 被引量:3

Terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of diversity of mucosa-associated microbiota in patients with Crohn's disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解克罗恩病患者同健康人群肠道黏膜相关细菌群落多样性差异。方法选择2010年9月至2011年12月在华西医院确诊的克罗恩病患者8例(克罗恩病组)和23名健康体检者(健康对照组),分别于结肠镜检查时取盲肠黏膜组织1块。末端限制性片段长度多态性(T—RFLP)检测黏膜相关细菌多样性;聚类分析法比较菌群组成差异,比较两组菌群多样性及优势菌群组成差异,通过MiCA数据库寻找优势末端片段可能代表的细菌种类。结果聚类分析显示克罗恩病组与健康对照组黏膜相关细菌组成不同,各组内样本相似性明显高于组问样本。克罗恩病组细菌丰度Haem酶切和MspI+HaeHI酶切显著峰数量(操作分类单元)均低于健康对照组[Haem:(7±4)比(10±8)个、P=0.048,MspI+Haem:(20±10)比(24±12)个、P=0.036]。克罗恩病组Shannon—Wiener指数与健康对照组差异无统计学意义(1.7±0.7比2.0±0.5,P=0.220);克罗恩病组物种均匀度和Simpson指数均高于健康对照组(0.84±0.14比0.77±0.13、0.25±0.16比0.22±0.15,P=0.045、0.038)。在MspI酶切分析中,37、40、66bp为克罗恩病组特有优势末端片段;相对定量比较提示克罗恩病组35bp含量高于健康对照组[36.8%(23.O%,55.4%)比14.3%(9.5%,19.5%),P=0.001];74、141、486、490bp含量则均低于健康对照组[3.2%(1.3%,5.1%)比10.2%(5.4%,17.3%),4.5%(1.7%,7.1%)比10.8%(5.9%,21.1%),4.2%(1.6%,5.3%)比7.6%(5.9%,9.3%),3.6%(2.4%,6.1%)比18.3%(9.9%,43.2%),P=0.001、0.007、0.022、0.008]。克罗恩病组黏膜相关细菌以硬壁菌门、变形菌门、放线菌门为主;与健康对照组比较,克罗恩病患者中拟杆菌明显少,硬壁菌门中的肠杆菌属及放线菌属含量明显多。结论克罗恩病患者存在明显肠道菌群失调,黏膜相关细菌丰度及多样性减少,拟杆菌的减少和硬壁菌门中的肠杆菌属、放线菌属含量增加可能在克罗恩病的发生及发展中扮演重要作用。 [ Abstract] Objective To explore the differences of colonic mucosal-associate bacterial diversity between the patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and healthy controls. Methods Eight CD patients and 23 healthy controls were recruited from September 2010 to December 2011 at West China Hospital. One biopsy were taken from cecum of every patient with CD and healthy control by endoscopic examination. The diversity of colonic mueosa-associated mierobiota was detected by terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) . Hierarchical cluster analysis were performed to compare the similarity of microbial communities between CD patients and healthy controls. Differences of bacterial diversity between two groups were also evaluated. The difference of predominant terminal-restrict fragments (T-RF) were analyzed and the bacterium predicted by predominant T-RFs were identified according to MiCA database. Results Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that the mueosal microbial community of CD patients differed from healthy controls. And there were more similarities in the samples of same group than that of different groups. Compared with healthy control group, the richness of mocosal microbiota in CD patients was lower ( Hae III: 7 ± 4 vs 10± 8, P = 0. 048 ; Msp I ± HaeIII :20 ± 10 vs 24± 12, P =0. 036). Shannon-Wiener index of CD patients was lower than healthy control( 1.7 ± 0. 7 vs 2. 0 + 0. 5, P = 0. 220) with no significant difference.Species evenness and Simpson index of CD patients were significantly greater than healthy controls (0. 84 ±0.14vs0.77±0.13, P = 0. 045 ; 0. 25 ±0.16 vs 0. 22 ±0.15 , P=0.038). The T-RF of 37, 40 and 66 bp digested with Msp I enzyme predominated in CD patients. Relative quantitative analysis showed 35 bp T- RF digested with Msp I was significantly higher in CD patients than that in healthy controls (36. 8% (23.0% , 55.4% ) vs 14. 3% (9.5% , 19.5% ) , P =0. 001) , and 74, 141,486,490 bp T-RFs were all significantly lower than healthy controls (3.2% ( 1.3 %, 5.1% ) vs 10. 2% (5.4%, 17.3 % ), P =0. 001 ; 4.5% (1.7%, 7. 1%) vs 10.8% (5.9%, 21.1%), P =0.007; 4.2% (1.6%, 5.3%) vs 7.6% (5.9%, 9.3%), P=0.022; 3.6%(2.4%, 6. 1%) vs 18.3% (9.9%, 43.2%), P=0.008). The mucosal bacterial community composition in CD patients was predominated by Firmicutes, Proteobacterium and Actinobacterium. Compare with healthy control, Bacteroides were significantly reduced in CD patients while Firmicutes (e.g. Enterobacter sp. ) and Actinomycetaceae significantly increased. Conclusions Dysbiosis of mucosal microbiota occurs in CD with decreases of richness and biodiversity. Increased Enterobacter sp. , Actinobacterium and decreased Bacteroides may play an important role in the pathogenesis of CD.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第36期2884-2889,共6页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 CROHN病 聚类分析 原位缺口末端标记 指纹图谱 Crohn disease Cluster analysis In situ nick-end labeling Finger-print
作者简介 冉文斌(现在成都市第三人民医院消化内科) 通信作者:欧阳钦,Email:qin.ouyang@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology, 2011, 140:1785-1794.
  • 2Bernstein CN, Fried M, Krabshuis JH, et al. World Gastroenterology Organization Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IBD in 2010. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2010, 16: 112-124.
  • 3Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med, 2009. 361,2066-2078_.
  • 4中华医学会消化病学分会炎症性肠病组.炎症性肠病诊断与治疗的共识意见(2012·广州).胃肠病学,2012,17:763G81.
  • 5Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, et al. Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362:1383-1395.
  • 6Sepehri S, Kotlowski R, Bernstein CN, et al. Microbial diversity of inflamed and noninflamed gut biopsy tissues in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2007, 13:675-683.
  • 7Engebretson JJ, Moyer CL. Fidelity of select restriction endonucleases in determining microbial diversity by terminal- restriction fragment length polymorphism. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003, 69:4823-4829.
  • 8Hayashi H, Takahashi R, Nishi T, et al. Molecular analysis of jejunal, ileal, eaeeal and recto-sigmoidal human colonic mierobiota using 16S rRNA gene libraries and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. J Med Microbiol, 2005, 54 : 1093-1101.
  • 9Berg RD. The indigenous gastrointestinal microflora. Trends Mierobiol, 1996, 4:430-435.
  • 10Kohyama A, Ogawa H, Funayama Y, et al. Bacterial population moves toward a colon-like community in the pouch after total proctoeoleetomy. Surgery, 2009, 145:435447.

同被引文献66

  • 1陈学亮,袁园园,袁联文.外周血小板/淋巴细胞比值和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对活动期克罗恩病的诊断价值[J].中华炎性肠病杂志(中英文),2019,3(1):88-89. 被引量:5
  • 2陈渝萍.肠道菌群状态在溃疡性结肠炎患者中的价值探讨[J].右江医学,2006,34(5):499-500. 被引量:3
  • 3布坎南 R E,吉本斯 N E.伯杰细菌鉴定手册[M].8 版,北京: 科学出版社,1984.
  • 4何明清 谢镜怀 朱玉兰 等.病、健仔猪不同肠段菌群的研究.畜牧兽医学报,1986,17(4):276-276.
  • 5Sears CL. Enterotoxigenie bacteroidesfragilis: a rogue among symbiotes[ J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2009, 22:349-369.
  • 6Wick EC, Sears CL. Bacteroides spp. and diarrhea [ J ]. Curt Opin Infect Dis, 2010 , 23:470-474.
  • 7Linskens RK, Huijsdens XW, Savelkoul PH, et al. The bacterial flora in inflammatory bowel disease: current insights in pathogenesis and the influence of antibiotics and probiotics [ J ]. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl, 2001, 234: 29-40.
  • 8Desreumaux P, Colombel JF. Intestinal flora and Crohn's disease [J]. Ann Pharm Fr, 2003 ,61 : 276-281.
  • 9Mazmanian SK, Round JL, Kasper DL. A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease[ J]. Nature, 2008, 453:620-625.
  • 10Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, et al. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system [ J ]. Cell, 2005, 122 : 107- 118.

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部