期刊文献+

中国城市政府公共支出效率分析——基于四阶段DEA方法的实证研究 被引量:24

Analysis of Efficiency of China City Government Public Expenditure:Empirical Research Based on Four-stage DEA method
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2008年中国内地126个地级以上城市为样本数据,利用四阶段DEA方法,对中国城市公共支出效率进行了实证分析。结果显示:如果不对外部环境因素加以控制,则经典的DEA方法将会高估城市公共支出效率;在控制外部环境因素影响后,样本城市公共支出效率得分为0.353,表明在保持支出不变下,通过改善组织管理、优化支出规模及结构,公共服务供给水平可提高约64%,城市公共支出效率还有很大的提升空间;经济发达、较大的辖区面积是城市公共支出效率提升的有利条件,而人口增加对公共品供给产生的拥挤效应不利于城市公共支出效率提升。 In this paper,based on the 126 prefecture-level cities-sample data in the mainland of China in 2008,we using four-stage DEA method conducted an empirical analysis of the efficiency of public spending.The empirical results show:If we do not control the external environmental factors,Classical DEA will overestimate the efficiency of city public expenditure;Controlling factors in the external environment,the sample of city public expenditure efficiency score of 0.353,which shows that in keeping spending constant,by improving the organization and management,optimizing the size and structure of expenditure,the level of public service supply can be increased by about 64%.As for the efficiency of city public spending,there is still much room for improvement;Developed economy and greater area are favorable conditions for city public expenditure efficiency gains.Urban crowding effect produced by the population growth on the supply of public goods is not conducive to upgrading the efficiency of public spending.
作者 王德祥 张权
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期41-48,共8页 Finance & Economics
关键词 公共支出效率 外部环境 四阶段DEA Public Expenditure Efficiency External Environment Four-stage DEA
作者简介 王德祥(1957-),男,武汉大学经济与管理学院(武汉,430072),教授。研究方向:公共经济理论与政策。张权(1970-),男,武汉大学经济与管理学院(武汉,430072),博士生。研究方向:公共经济理论与政策。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献57

  • 1张军,金煜.中国的金融深化和生产率关系的再检测:1987—2001[J].经济研究,2005,40(11):34-45. 被引量:567
  • 2平新乔,白洁.中国财政分权与地方公共品的供给[J].财贸经济,2006,27(2):49-55. 被引量:297
  • 3Charles Tiebout, "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, " Journal of Political Economy, vol. 64, no. 5, 1956, pp. 416-424.
  • 4Wallace Oates, Fiscal Federalism, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.
  • 5Michael Marlow, "Fiscal Decentralization and Government Size, " Public Choice, vol. 56, 1988, pp. 259-270.
  • 6Allison Rowland, " Population as a Determinant of Local Outcomes under Decentralization Illustrations from Small Municipalities in Bolivia and Mexico," World Development, vol. 29, no. 8 2001, pp. 1373-1389.
  • 7Roger Gordon, "An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism, " Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 98, 1983, pp. 567-586.
  • 8Robert Schwab, Wallace Oates, "Community Composition and the Provision of Local Public Goods, " Journal of Public Economics, vol. 44, 1991, pp. 217-237.
  • 9Diana Conyers, “Centralization and Developing Planning: A Comparative Perspective,” in de Valk, P. and K. Wekwete, eds., Decentralizing for Participatory Planning, Avebury: Aldershot, 1990.
  • 10Kathy Hayes, Laura Razzolini, Leola Ross, “Bureaucratic Choice and Nonoptimal Provision of Public Goods: Theory and Evidence, ” Public Choice, vol. 94, 1998, pp. 1-20.

共引文献530

同被引文献268

二级引证文献216

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部