摘要
"虚"和"实"是历史小说创作中必然面临的两个问题,而正是"文"与"史"的结合造成了古代历史小说在创作中的矛盾,由此出发,古代历史小说分化为了"信史"和"贵幻"两种发展方向,形成了各自不同的创作理论和小说文本,它们都是历史小说创作者本身历史观念的具体呈现。通俗性、娱乐性和道德教化是两个流派的共同点。
There were two situations that were fabrication and reliable historical account in creation contradiction of ancient historical novels inevitably because of combination of literature and history. From then on, ancient historical novels had differenced two kinds of development directions which were ＂reliable historical account＂ and ＂advocating imaginary＂, and had formed respectively the different creation theory and the novel text which all were the historical novel creator＇ s history idea present specifically. The popularity, the entertainment and the moral enlightenment were both of schools＇ common grounds.
出处
《河北科技师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2008年第3期1-4,14,共5页
Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
文与史
虚实
信史
贵幻
literature and history, fabrication and historical evidence, reliable historical account
advocating imaginary
作者简介
肖锋（1976-），讲师，博士，主要从事文艺学基本原理和中国古代文论研究。
