企业成为创新主体与R&D补贴的政府角色定位被引量：59

Enterprises as Innovative Entities and Government Roles in R&D Subsidies

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要本文以国家创新系统为背景,研究了企业成为创新主体与政府R&D补贴的角色定位。结论是:为引导企业成为自主创新主体,间接补贴是更有效的方法;对竞争性行业,应采用间接补贴,对公共品性质的行业,应采用直接补贴;在引导企业成为自主创新主体的过程中,不能因为政府对企业有创新补贴,就对企业创新活动和创新项目的规模、市场定位和实施方式等进行直接的干预,而应通过企业按照市场机制去选择符合企业经营模式和经营战略的创新项目,这是政府支持企业创新中应保持的角色定位。 Based on national backgrounds of innovative systems, the pape studies how enterprises become independent innovative entities and what roles governments play in R＆D subsidies. The results demonstrate that indirect subsidy is a much better effective way to induce an enterprise be such an innovative entity ; indirect subsidy should respond to competitive industries while direct subsidy to public - utility industries ; in the process of becoming innovative entity under R＆D subsidies, direct intervention by government, such as dictations or restrictions of size, market and activities of innovative projects, should be avoid, which is determined by enterprises based on their operations and strategies. It is the government＇s roles located in R＆D subsidies.

作者唐清泉卢珊珊李懿东

机构地区中山大学管理学院

出处《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期88-98,共11页 China Soft Science

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70772084) 中山大学"985工程"产业与区域发展创新基地项目

关键词创新主体创新补贴角色定位补贴选择 innovative entity innovative subsidy roles location subsidy choice

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

作者简介唐清泉（1960-），男，四川蓬溪人．中山大学管理学院教授、博士、博士生导师。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Bernard A. and Waldemar K. Technology Strategy and Sustained Growth [ J ]. Technology in Society, 2005,27 (4): 453 - 470.
2Jose L. S. and Rosario C. Competitiveness and Innovation Systems [ J ]. Technovation ,2005, 25 (9) : 1059 - 1070.
3Ornaghi, C. Spillovers in product and Process Innovation [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 2 (24) :349 - 380.
4Romer P. Increasing Returns and Long- run Growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986,5(94) : 1002 - 1037.
5Hyytinen, A. , &Toivanen, O. Do Financial Constraints Hold Back Innovationand Growth [ J ]. Research Policy,2005, 34(9) : 1385 - 1403.
6李军.国家创新系统与企业创新关系分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001,18(7):7-13. 被引量：8
7谢光亚,张蔚.论国家创新系统及其政策工具的选择[J].湖南大学学报（社会科学版）,2002,16(5):52-55. 被引量：8
8刘浩.政府补助的会计制度变迁路径研究[J].当代经济科学,2002,24(2):80-84. 被引量：21
9Narula, R. & Dunning, J. H. Explaining International R&D Alliances and the Role of Governments [ J ]. International Business Review, 1998,4( 7 ) :377 - 397.
10Cumming, D. Government Policy towards Entrepreneurial Finance: Innovation Investment Funds [ J ]. Journal of Business Venturing,2007, 2 (22) : 193 - 235.

二级参考文献59

1唐金玉.基层科技投入存在的问题与对策[J].云南科技管理,1995(2):16-19. 被引量：1
2冯之俊.国家创新系统的理论与政策[M].经济科学出版社,1999..
3财政部会计司财政部国际合作司.《完善与发展--会计准则国际研讨会（上海·1994）》[M].中国财政经济出版社,1994..
4吴秀波.激励RampD投资的税收优惠政策研究[J].科学管理研究,2001,(3).
5高建.中国企业技术创新能力研究 [M].北京：清华大学出版社,1997年..
6奥利弗 E 威廉姆森段毅才王伟译.资本主义经济制度[M].北京:商务出版社,2002..
7Dehua Ju. China's budding software industry [J]. IEEE Software, May - June 2001 : 92 -95.
8Howard Rubin, Margaret Johnson, and Susan Iventosch. The US software industry [ J ]. IEEE Software, Jan. -Feb.2002 : 95 - 97.
9J. Robins and M. F. Wiersema. A resource- based approach to the multibusiness firm: empirical analysis of the portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance [ J 1.Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16:277-299.
10Ashish Arora, V. S. Arunachalam, Jai Asundi, and Ronald Fernandes. The Indian software services industry [ J ]. Research Policy, 2001, 30: 1267-1287.