期刊文献+

我国农业科技企业技术创新动力不足原因的期权博弈分析 被引量:9

Analysis on Reasons of Lacking Motivation of Technological Innovation in Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Enterprises by Option-game Approach
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我国加入WTO之后,本土农业科技企业面临着跨国公司日益激烈的竞争。与外资农业科技企业相比,我国农业企业技术创新的动力明显不足。文章利用期权博弈理论模型,将本土企业与外资企业视为战略互动的博弈双方,分析提出了本土企业技术创新动力相对不足,是在其处于成本劣势的条件下创新成功需时较长或成本差异较大而导致的必然结果,并提出了相应的对策建议。 After the entry of WTO, Chinese native agricultural science and technology enterprises are faced with increasingly intense competition coming from transnational corporation. Compared with the overseas-funded enterprises, the motivation of our native agricultural science and technology enterprises to launch technological innovation is apparently not strong enough. Using option games theory, this paper regarded native and transnational enterprises as two players in a game, and pointed out that lack of motivation to launch technological innovation in native enterprises is a inevitable result because there is a big cost gap between the two. Some corresponding countermeasures were put forward.
作者 孙倩 邓心安
出处 《农业科技管理》 2007年第4期91-93,96,共4页 Management of Agricultural Science and Technology
关键词 期权博弈 农业科技企业 技术创新动力 Option-games Agricultural science and technology enterprise Motivation to launch technological innovation
作者简介 孙倩(1983-),女,北京理工大学管理与经济学院硕士研究生.主要研究方向:信息管理的理论与方法.
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献28

  • 1[1]Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment Under Uncertainty[ M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
  • 2[2]Amram M, Kulatilaka N. Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World[M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
  • 3[3]Kulatilaka N, Perotti E C. Strategic growth options[J]. Management Science, 1998, 44(8): 1021-1031.
  • 4[4]Kulatilaka N, Pertti E C. Time-to-market capability as Stackelberg growth options[A]. In: Schwartz E, Trigeorgis L, ed. Innovation and Strategy: New Developments and Applications in Real Options[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 5[5]Pertti E C, Rossetto S. Internet Portals as Portfolios of Entry Options[R]. Working Paper, No. 00-105/2. Amsterdam, Netherlands: University of Amsterdam and CEPR, 2000. (http:∥www. tinbergen, nl/discussionpapers/00105, pdf)
  • 6[6]Reinganum J F. On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1981, 48(3): 395-405.
  • 7[7]Reinganum J F. Market structure and the diffusion of new technology[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1981, 12(2): 618-624.
  • 8[8]Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1985, 52(3): 383-401.
  • 9[9]Gotz G. Strategic timing of adoption of new technology under uncertainty: A note[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2000, 18(2): 369-379.
  • 10[10]Weeds H. Strategic delay in real options model of R & D competition[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69(3): 729-747.

共引文献76

同被引文献89

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部