摘要
法律体系本身不可能如概念法学所想象那样是一个公理体系,法学有自己的“范式”,这些范式是法律共同体经过多年的法律实践积淀而成并通过职业教育传授的基本法律理论、法律信念、法律方法以及规范标准等等。实践性构成了法学的学问性格,法学是论题取向的,而不是公理取向的。如果法学家放弃建立纯而又纯的法律公理体系之梦,而将法律体系看作是一个“开放的体系”,那么将论题学的“片段性的省察”与公理学的演绎推理方法结合起来完成法律的体系建构和体系解释,也不是完全不可能的。
Legal system is not in itself an axiomatic system as the Conceptual Jurisprudence has imagined. With basic legal theories, legal methods and normal criteria, Jurisprudence has its paradigms which came into being after years of legal practices and are learned through professional training in legal community. Practicality constitutes a knowledge character of jurisprudence, which is a theory of topoi-oriented, not axiom-oriented. If the legal system were considered as an open system without dreams to build up the pure axiomatic system of law, there would be probability to accomplish the systematic construction and interpretation of law by combining the topics' fragmentary insight and the axiom's deductive method.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期3-20,共18页
Chinese Journal of Law
