摘要
第三人主动承诺履行或实际履行债务的性质及效力应根据不同情形认定。若第三人是以债务人的名义履行 ,应属无权代理。当债务人予以承认时 ,该行为转为有权代理 ;若债务人不予承认 ,当第三人的行为符合债务人意愿、有利于债务人时 ,应属无因管理 ;不符合债务人意愿、不利于债务人时 ,应属不当得利。若第三人是以自己名义履行 ,应属债务移转。第三人有否追偿权也与其行为性质密切相关。
The nature and effect of a third party’s active promise to perform the obligations or his actual performance of the obligations shall be defined differently in different circumstances. If the third party performs in the obligor’s name, it shall be defined as unauthorized agency. Should the obligor admit such an act, he shall turn into authorized agency; should the obligor refuse to admit such an act, when the act is in conformity with the intent of and is favorable to the obligor, it shall be defined as voluntary service, and when the act is not in conformity with the intent of and is unfavorable to the obligor, it shall be defined as unjust enrichment. If the third party performs in his own name, it shall be defined as transfer of obligations. Whether the third party has the right of recourse is firmly connected with the nature of his act.
出处
《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2004年第4期27-32,共6页
Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
