期刊文献+

议题建构与认同聚合:中美疫情治理的比较研究——基于政治动员视角 被引量:1

Topic Construction and Identity Aggregation:A Comparative Study of Epidemic Management between China and the United States——Based on the Perspective of Political Mobilization
原文传递
导出
摘要 新冠肺炎疫情在全球的多点爆发与蔓延对各国的经济秩序、民生健康以及社会稳定造成了极大影响。如何有效地防控疫情,维持社会的正常运转一度成为检验各国治理能力和治理体系的重要标准。政治动员作为权力主体进行资源整合与社会治理的重要手段之一,在应对当下的疫情危机方面发挥着重要的社会效能。本文借助政治动员理论和政治动员实践的释义框架,探究中美两国在疫情实践中的运行逻辑和实践特征。研究发现:中美两国在政治动员主体方面,呈现出高度统一的权力聚合性与内分式的权力博弈,政府权力主体的高信任度与低信任度等差异;在动员的议题建构方面,则呈现出议题"质料"建构的相对同一性与"形式"维度的显著性差异,即话语挪用、宣传鼓动、典型示范的中国式动员与种族主义的话语实践之间的冲突与矛盾;而在政治动员的认同聚合层面,则表现出作为整体性观念的强认同聚合与作为个体主义和自由主义观念的利益协商与分化。 The global outbreak and spread of the COVID-19 epidemic has caused great impact on the economic order,livelihood and health of the various countries and social stability.How to effectively prevent and control the epidemic and maintain the normal operation of society has become an important standard to test the governance capacity and governance system of various countries.As one of the important means of resource integration and social governance,political mobilization plays an important role in coping with the current epidemic crisis.This paper attempts to explore the operational logic and practical characteristics of China and the United States in the epidemic practice with the help of the interpretation framework of political mobilization theory and political mobilization practice.The results show that:In terms of political mobilization subjects,there are highly unified power aggregation and internal fraction power game,high trust and low trust of government power subjects;In terms of the issue construction of mobilization,there is a significant difference between the relative identity of the issue“material”construction and the“form”dimension,that is,the conflict and contradiction between discourse appropriation,propaganda and encouragement,typical demonstration of Chinese mobilization and the discourse practice of racism;On the level of identity aggregation of political mobilization,it shows strong identity aggregation as a holistic concept and interest negotiation and differentiation as individualism and liberalism.
作者 咸玉柱 孙卫华 Xian Yuzhu;Sun Weihua
出处 《比较政治学研究》 2021年第1期245-263,284-285,共21页 Comparative Politics Studies
关键词 政治动员 疫情治理 合法性 议题建构 认同聚合 political mobilization epidemic management legitimacy topic construction identity aggregation
作者简介 咸玉柱:天津师范大学新闻传播学院博士研究生,研究方向为网络舆情与社会治理;孙卫华,传播学博士,天津师范大学新闻传播学院教授,博士生导师。
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献101

共引文献152

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部