摘要
从免疫学范式来看新冠疫情的应对方式,以中国为首的东方社会采取了“隔离抗疫”的应对,而以美国为典型代表的西方社会则采取了“群体免疫”的应对方式。在中国对疫情基本实现了阻断控制的情况下,疫情正在海外“肆虐”,这在现实层面造成了区域之间的新“隔离”,两种社会免疫范式的选择呈现出西方自由主义文化与东方伦理型文化之间的观念对峙。在全球化正走向深度共享与合作的时代,文化的对峙不能走向政治对抗,世界范围内应当建立起对人类命运共同体的共识并在全球文明视野下去寻找“在一起”的融合之路。
From the perspective of immunological paradigm to deal with the COVID-19,the eastern society led by China adopted the isolation and anti-epidemic approach,while the western society represented by the United States adopted the herd immunity approach.As China has basically achieved blockade and control of the epidemic,the epidemic is raging overseas,which has caused new isolation between regions.The choice of two paradigms of social immunity presents the conceptual confrontation between Western liberal culture and Eastern ethical culture.In the era of deep sharing and cooperation in globalization,cultural confrontation should not lead to political confrontation.People all over the world should establish a consensus on a community with a shared future for mankind and look for a path of"together"integration from the perspective of global civilization.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
2022年第1期304-315,共12页
Contemporary Marxism Review
关键词
新冠疫情
社会免疫
共同体
伦理型文化
COVID-19
Social immunity paradigm
Community
Ethical Culture
作者简介
胡盛澜,东南大学人文学院博士研究生
