摘要
组织帮助型协议是区别于横向垄断协议和纵向垄断协议的混合型垄断协议,在我国反垄断法实行横向、纵向垄断协议规制的二分法背景下,如何应对这一混合型垄断协议面临很大的挑战。组织帮助型协议并不要求轴心经营者具有市场支配地位,关键在于其是否组织或帮助促成了横向合谋协议,产生了排除限制竞争效果和造成消费者福利损失。组织帮助型协议规制也不能当然适用本身违法原则,需要结合轴心经营者所在领域的竞争状况,灵活运用本身违法和合理分析原则进行个案判断。
As a new type of anti-competitive behavior in the new economy and the traditional economy,organizing-assisted monopoly agreement is a hybrid type which is different from horizontal and vertical monopoly agreement.Under the dichotomy of horizontal and vertical monopoly agreement in China’s anti-monopoly law,how to deal with this hybrid monopoly agreement is a great challenge.The agreement of organizational help does not necessarily require the hub operator to have the dominant market position,the key is whether it helps to promote the horizontal collusion agreement and produces the effect of eliminating and restricting competition and causes the loss of consumer welfare.The regulation of organizing-assisted monopoly agreement can not be applied to per se illegal principle of itself,it is necessary to flexibly use per se illegal or rule of reason principle to judge individual cases according to the competition situation of the relevant market of the hub operators.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期105-114,共10页
Law Review
基金
作者主持的国家社科基金一般项目“竞争政策视野下的互联网平台规制研究”(项目编号:18BFX151)
中国政法大学科研创新引导专项项目(项目编号:19ZFY82001)的研究成果
关键词
核心限制行为
组织帮助
轴辐协议
本身违法原则
合理分析原则
Hardcore Restriction
Organizing-Assisted
Hub and Spoke Conspiracy
Per se Illegal
Principles of Reasonable Analysis
作者简介
戴龙,中国政法大学国际法学院教授。
