期刊文献+

牟取暴利行为与哄抬物价行为认定标准上的冲突与协调

Conflict and Coordination in the Standards for Determining the Behavior of Profiteering and the Behavior of Price Grouping
原文传递
导出
摘要 牟取暴利和哄抬物价作为两种典型的价格违法行为,对其实施价格管制具有必要性与合理性。但不得不承认的是:法律认定标准上的模糊性直接导致两者关系混乱,行为外观上的相似性也导致两者区分困难。牟取暴利行为和哄抬物价行为之间关系的协调,应当通过清晰界分牟取暴利和哄抬物价行为的各自适用范围实现。这不仅与立法目的相契合,也能够赋予《制止牟取暴利的暂行规定》新的生命力。而剥离牟取暴利与哄抬物价的适用前提是明确突发事件的内涵。 Profiteering and price gouging as two typical price offences,the implementation of price control is necessary and reasonable.However,it has to be admitted that the ambiguity of the legal recognition standard directly leads to the confusion of the relationship between those two,and the similarity of the appearance of the behaviour also leads to the difficulty of distinguishing between those two.The coordination of the relationship between profiteering and price gouging should be achieved through a clear demarcation of the respective scope of application of profiteering and price gouging.This is not only in line with the purpose of the legislation,but also to give new life to the Interim Provisions for the Suppression of Profiteering.The stripping of profiteering and price gouging application of the premise is to clarify the connotation of emergencies.
作者 刘继峰 王迪 LIU Jifeng;WANG Di
出处 《价格理论与实践》 北大核心 2023年第6期27-31,124,共6页 Price:Theory & Practice
关键词 牟取暴利 哄抬物价 突发事件 价格管制 profiteering price gouging emergencies price control
作者简介 刘继峰系中国政法大学民商经济法学院教授
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部