期刊文献+

再论内卷化,兼论去内卷化 被引量:88

Re-thinking Involution and De-involution
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文是一篇综合性的简短论析,聚焦于两大领域。首先是中国农业经济的内卷化和去内卷化的特征和机制,以及其与中国现代工业演变的共通性;而后是治理体系中的官僚主义内卷化及去内卷化。文章进而论析这两大领域间的关联、共通和相互强化。文章指出,要更彻底地去内卷化,中国的出路尤其在更大范围的创新和质变。为此,中国这一强势政党国家,区别于英美新自由主义虚构的"无为"国家,所起的领导作用乃是一种历史必须,不可或缺。中国可以借助传统和革命经验中的"简约治理"和"第三领域"传统,以及改革期间大规模赋权、赋能予人民,继续探索处于英美"自由民主主义"和中国革命传统中的"群众路线"之间的人民参与"主义"道路,藉此来释放更多更大的创新能量,形成真正符合中国实际需要的长远去内卷化的发展道路。 This is an abbreviated overview discussion-analysis,about two main spheres.The first is involution and de-involution in agriculture,their characteristics and mechanisms of change,and also their commonalities with industrial change in contemporary China.The second is involution and de-involution in bureaucratism.The article goes on to the connections,commonalities,and mutual reinforcements between the two.The article suggests that,in order to proceed to further de-involution,China needs above all more innovations that produce qualitative change.For that purpose,the leadership role played by the powerful party-state of China,in contrast to the artificial construct of a"laissez faire"state in Anglo-American neoliberalism,is a necessity born of history.Over and above that,China needs to borrow from the"centralized minimalism"and"third sphere"traditions of its imperial heritage and recent revolutionary past,as well as the granting of powers and rights to the people during the Reform era,to continue to seek a path that is intermediate between Anglo-American"liberal democracy"and China’s revolutionary"mass line,"of popular participation"-ism,"to release thereby still greater innovative energies to embark upon a long-term,de-involutionary development path,one that truly accords with Chinese realities and needs.
作者 黄宗智 Philip C.C.Huang(Institute for Advanced Historical and Social Research,Law School,Renmin University of China)
出处 《开放时代》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期157-168,8,共13页 Open Times
关键词 内卷型商品化 资本与劳动双密集的中级模式 资本密集型 内卷与创新 自由民主主义与革命群众主义 involutionary commercialization "labor and capital dual intensifying"intermediate-stage de-involu-tion capital intensive involution vs.innovation between liberal-democracy and the revolutionary mass line
作者简介 黄宗智:中国人民大学法学院历史与社会高等研究所、美国加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶校区历史系(荣休)
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献215

共引文献1971

同被引文献1175

二级引证文献567

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部