期刊文献+

中外作者科技论文英文摘要的句法复杂性对比研究

原文传递
导出
摘要 句法复杂性指语言产出中句法结构的多样性及复杂性,是衡量二语产出的重要指标之一。学习者二语写作句法复杂性可以体现学习者对目的语习得的实际情况,是衡量二语写作者语言行为及目的语发展整体水平的标准。与以往研究从词汇层面和体裁分析入手不同,本研究以句法为切入点,旨在对比中外作者科技论文英文摘要的句法复杂性,从而为今后中国科技论文英文摘要写作及教学提供启发。 Syntactic complexity,also known as grammatical complexity or syntactic maturity,refers to the diversity and complexity of syntactic structures in the language production.Syntactic complexity in L2 English writing reflects learners’actual proficiency of second language acquisition and the overall level of L2 English writing.Different from previous studies from the perspective of lexical level and genre analysis,the present study aims to compare the syntactic complexity of Chinese and foreign scholars,so as to provide implications for the writing and teaching of English abstract of Chinese science and technology papers.
作者 李珊
出处 《现代英语》 2021年第10期87-89,共3页 Modern English
关键词 句法复杂度 中外作者科技论文 对比研究 syntactic complexity English abstract contrastive study
作者简介 李珊(1995~),女,汉族,安徽芜湖人,浙江师范大学外国语学院,硕士研究生,研究方向:语篇分析。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献99

  • 1文秋芳.英语专业学生口语词汇变化的趋势与特点[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(3):189-195. 被引量:116
  • 2文秋芳.英语专业学生口语词汇进步模式研究[J].外语电化教学,2006(4):3-8. 被引量:23
  • 3Beers, S. F. & W. E. Nagy. 2009. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which register? [J]. Read Writ 22: 185-200.
  • 4Baba, K. 2009. Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 18,191-208.
  • 5Berman, R. A. & L. Verhoeven. 2002. Crosslinguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing[J]. Written Language and Literacy 5, 1 : 1-43.
  • 6Chastain, K. 1990. Characteristics of graded and ungraded compositions [J]. The Modern Language Journal 74, 1: 10-14.
  • 7Crowhurst, M. 1983. Syntactic complexity and writing quality: A review [J!. Canadian Journal of Education 8, 1: 1-16.
  • 8Engber, C. A. 1995. The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of L2 compositions[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 4: 139-155.
  • 9Foster, P., A. Tonkyn & G. Wigglesworth. 2000. Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons [J]. Applied Linguistics 21, 3: 354-375.
  • 10Foster, P. & P. Tavakoli. 2009. Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity [J]. Language Learning 59, 4: 866-896.

共引文献164

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部