摘要
大陆刑法原因自由行为理论认为,行为人故意或过失自陷无责任能力状态,虽然在实施危害社会行为时并无责任能力,但是行为人仍然要负全部行为刑事责任。为了论证处罚原因自由行为并不违反现代刑法责任原则,产生了责任原则维持说、修正说和例外说,修正说既有力论证了原因自由行为的可罚性,又维护了刑法理论的稳定。我国刑法应在主客观相统一原则下正确处理醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任。
The theory of Actio libera in causa in Romano - Germanic family holds that if one intentionally or negligently causes oneself into the state of being no capacity for criminal responsibility, although cannot recognize or control the act while committing crimes against society, he or she should still bear the criminal duties. However, somehow this theory may break the principle of concurrence between the mens rea and the actus reus. In order to solve this problem, someone strictly sticks to it, someone has revised it, and still others hold that punishing Actio libera in causa is its exception. Our criminal code provides ＂any intoxicated person who commits a crime shall bear criminal responsibility. ＂ It shall be strictly explained under the principle of the unification of the subjective elements and the objective elements.
出处
《湖北民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2009年第3期142-146,共5页
Journal of Hubei Minzu University：Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词
原因自由行为
责任原则
醉酒犯罪
主客观相统一
actio libera in causa
the correspondence principle
crimes committed by drunkards
the princi- ple of the unification of the subjective elements and the objective elements
作者简介
黄继坤（1973-），男，湖北省恩施人，法学硕士，主要研究方向为比较刑法学、中国刑法学。
