摘要
孔子从道德和事功的分合着眼,对管仲作出了“如其仁”和“不知礼”是非两分的评价;孟子则鉴于时代要求和推行王道的需要,极力贬低管仲的霸道功业及其品德;程颐和朱熹从寻求普适的道德标准出发,以长幼、忠信之义为原则对管仲、魏征作出了正反不同的评价;王夫之以国家大义替代长幼之义,亟称管仲之仁与功,同时严斥魏征之不仁不义。由此反映了儒家在坚持义以至上的同时,对义利合一的艰难追求。
Confucius makes both a positive and negative comment on GUAN Zhong from the perspective of morality and achievements. Meneius largely devaluates GUAN＇s achievements and personal character for the demand of the kingly government. CHENG Yi and ZHU Xi start from seeking a universal moral standard and put forward criticisms on GUAN Zhong and WEI Zheng from opposite angles by the principle of the order between the elder and the younger and fidelity. WANG Fu -zhi replaces the order principle with the national benefit, and praises highly GUAN＇s virtue and achievements, but in the mean time disparages WEI＇s disloyalty. These views reveal the hard pursuit of the Confueians who persist in righteousness and in its unification with gain.
出处
《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第3期111-117,共7页
Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词
孔子
孟子
程颐
朱熹
王夫之
管仲
魏征
生死义利
Confucius
Meneius
CHENG Yi
ZHU Xi
WANG Fu - zhi
GUAN Zhong
WEI Zheng
outlook in life, death, righteousness, and gain
作者简介
许家星（1978-），男，江西省奉新县人，北京师范大学价值与文化研究中心，博士生。
