摘要
20世纪下半叶,社会理论界经历了一场影响深远的"实践转向"。本文首先追溯了这一变革的思想来源,即前期海德格尔的"在世存在"和后期维特根斯坦论"遵守规则",然后交代了实践理论所关注的六个核心论题。接着,文章讨论了斯蒂芬.特纳对实践概念的分析和批判。特纳认为,实践概念存在不可克服的缺陷,因而实践转向是一场错误的转向。对此,约瑟夫.劳斯借助于规范的实践概念予以回应。该实践概念不仅可以规避特纳的批评,而且使得我们能够更加深刻地把握实践转向的意义。
The practice turn has occurred in the cycle of social theorist since the second half of the twentieth century.It is argued firstly that this movement is originated from Heidegger's In-der-Welt-Sein and Wittgenstein's rule-following.Then the six themes of practice turn will be presented.last,the analysis and criticism of the concept of practice by Stephen Turn will be discussed carefully.According to him it is a wrong turn.Joseph Rouse proposes a normative concept of practice as a response to Turner.The paper will insist that Rouse successfully avoids difficulties pointed out by Turner,and that this exchange will deepen our understanding of the significance of practice turn.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第10期47-51,共5页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词
实践转向
海德格尔
维特根斯坦
特纳
劳斯
Practice Turn,Heidegger,Wittgenstein,Stephen Turner,Joseph Rouse
作者简介
作者孟强,中国社会科学院哲学研究所助理研究员,哲学博士。(北京100732)